View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Product Strategy RICE Scoring |  Operations ABC Analysis |  Operations Gemba Walk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When many initiatives compete for the same resources, it brings reach, impact, confidence, and effort into one shared ranking. It makes prioritization economically connectable. | With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention. | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 60-90 min | 30-60 min | 30-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 2-10 | 1-5 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | RICE Scores, Ranked List, Assumption Log | ABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | PrioritizationScoringRoadmapTradeoffs | PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio | LeanObservationProcessOperations |