View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Product Strategy DIBB |  UX Research Diary Study |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 45-90 min | 1-2 h | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-8 | 2-8 | 5-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | UX researchTrackingBehavior |