View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  UX Research Diary Study |  Agile Example Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 Wochen | 20-40 min pro Story | 1-4 Wochen | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-6 | 5-20 | 3-7 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions |
Tagsno overlap | UX researchObservationContext | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | UX researchTrackingBehavior | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement |