View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Domain Modeling Context Map |  Operations MORT Analysis |  Systems Thinking Systems Mapping |  Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. | Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen | 1-3 h | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-6 | 3-12 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations | System Map, Dependencies, Leverage Points | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident | Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |