methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Context Map workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Domain Modeling
Context Map
Paper illustration for Domain Context Map
Domain Modeling
Domain Context Map
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Purposedifferent
When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries.When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-3 h30-120 min1-3 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
2-83-102-64-12 Beobachtungen
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary NotesDomain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership MapObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasField Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points
Tagsno overlap
Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy
Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries
LeanObservationProcessOperations
UX researchObservationContext
Add more methods