View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Domain Modeling Context Map |  Product Discovery Assumption Mapping |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Product Discovery Test Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 45-60 min | 1-2 h | 20-35 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 2-8 | 1-5 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Test Card with a pre-set threshold |
Tagsno overlap | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |