View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Context Canvas |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Facilitation 1-2-4-All |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 60–90 min | 10-20 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 2-8 | 4-100+ | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Idea List, Shared Insights, Emergent Themes | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | FacilitationInclusionIdeation | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |