methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Context Canvas with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Context Canvas
Paper illustration of a yellow story card, blue rule cards, green example cards and a red question card on a light workspace.
Agile
Example Mapping
Process Mapping method illustration showing its working structure
Operations
Process Mapping
Paper illustration of Specification by Example with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Agile
Specification by Example
Purposedifferent
When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency.When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound.With a confusing workflow that has many handoffs, the method makes the actual process visible. It shows where work is passed on, delayed, or duplicated, so improvement targets the right spots.When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min30-60 min1-3 h60-90 min pro Feature
Participantsdifferent
3-103-73-103-6
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notesExample Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open QuestionsProcess Map, Handoff List, Improvement BacklogExample Table, Acceptance Tests
Tagsno overlap
ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas
Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement
ProcessOperationsImprovement
AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development
Add more methods