methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing Context Canvas with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Context Canvas
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
Paper board with the four ROAM fields Resolved, Owned, Accepted, and Mitigated.
Agile
ROAM Board
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Purposedifferent
When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency.When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List.When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-4 Wochen20-40 min initial, dann laufend1-3 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
3-105-203-154-12 Beobachtungen
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Context canvas, Open questions, Shared context notesDiary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineROAM Board, Owner ListField Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points
Tagsno overlap
ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas
UX researchTrackingBehavior
RiskAgileTrackingAlignment
UX researchObservationContext
Add more methods