methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Paper illustration for Starfish Retrospective
Agile
Starfish Retrospective
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Purposedifferent
When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.When improvement options need to be sorted more finely than just start and stop, it brings observations into clear kinds of action. This makes visible what should be done more, less, newly, or continued.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-90 min45-90 min30-60 min30-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-84-123-121-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Constraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesStarfish Board, Practice Changes, ExperimentsStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption List
Tagsno overlap
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
RetrospectiveImprovementExperimentsTeam
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
DecisionTreeOptions
Add more methods