methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Scenario Planning method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
Scenario Planning
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Purposedifferent
When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-90 min0.5-2 Tage30-90 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
2-84-121-62-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Constraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesScenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust OptionsDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
StrategyUncertaintyPlanning
DecisionTreeOptions
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Add more methods