methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Constraint Analysis.
Decision Making
Constraint Analysis
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
When an initiative stalls, the limit often lies not in the idea but in hard or soft boundary conditions. Constraint Analysis separates these limits and shows which of them can actually be shaped.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighLowHigh
Timedifferent
30-90 min2-6 h20–45 min2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
2-83-8Small cross-functional group3-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Constraint List, Hard/Soft Classification, Option Impact Notes, Decision BoundariesFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ConstraintsDecisionPlanningOptions
RiskRoot causeSafety
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods