View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Facilitation Consensus Workshop | ![]() Product Discovery Experiment Canvas | ![]() Facilitation Dot Voting | ![]() Product Discovery Test Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 30-60 min | 5-15 min | 20-35 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-30 | 1-5 | 3-20 | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Test Card with a pre-set threshold |
Tagsno overlap | FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |



