methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Purposedifferent
When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h30-60 min1-4 Wochen45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
5-302-106-30 Experten3-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
DecisionRolesGovernance
Add more methods