methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration for Risk Storming.
Architecture
Risk Storming
Purposedifferent
When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h45-60 min1-5 Tage60-90 min
Participantsdifferent
5-302-8Nutzertraffic4-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Consensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk rankingInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteAnnotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog
Tagsno overlap
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation
Add more methods