View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Team Design Team API |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 45-90 min | Half day initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | 3-12 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Team API Document | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |