View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Innovation Design Thinking |  Product Discovery Solution Interview |  Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 30-60 min je Interview | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | 4-10 | 5-10 Interviews | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | Solution Feedback, Objection List, Validation Notes | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | InnovationPrototypeResearch | ValidationInterviewsPrototype | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |