View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |  Innovation Design Charrette |  Innovation Crazy 8s |  Innovation Starbursting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. | In a tightly timed design process with many participants, the method pools several lines of thinking in a short time. It brings parallel design energy without letting the discussion tip into endless coordination. This quickly produces solid directions for architecture or space. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. | Helps clarify ideas, open questions, and testable next steps in concrete terms. It opens the thinking space, collects ideas, and leads to testable options. The result is captured as a star-shaped question map, question list, and assumption list. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 Wochen | Halber Tag bis mehrere Tage | 8-15 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 Kunden | 10-50 | 1-10 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks | Sketches and Concepts, Consolidated Solution Sketch, Prioritized Direction | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options | Star-Shaped Question Map, Question List, Assumption List |
Tagsno overlap | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery | BrainstormingWorkshopCollaborationIdeation | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint | BrainstormingIdeationWorkshopDiscovery |