methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 Wochen1-4 Wochen20-35 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
3-10 Kunden6-30 Experten1-5Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesTest Card with a pre-set thresholdClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods