View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Agile Sailboat Retrospective |  Knowledge Modeling Knowledge Mapping |  Agile Start Stop Continue |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture. | Knowledge Mapping makes knowledge, gaps, and transfer paths visible across a field. It fits when expertise should not just exist but also be findable and transferable. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 45-90 min | 1-3 h | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 4-12 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Sailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions | Knowledge Map, Critical Knowledge Areas, Transfer Plan | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | RetrospectiveTeamImprovement | KnowledgeMappingRisk | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection |