View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 3-15 | 3-12 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | ROAM Board, Owner List | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |