View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |  UX Research User Interviews |  Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-60 min je Interview | 30–60 min per interview | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 5-12 Interviews | 1 participant per interview | 1-5 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis |