View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  UX Research User Interviews |  Product Discovery Problem Interview |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-60 min je Interview | 30–60 min per interview | 30-60 min je Interview |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 5-12 Interviews | 1 participant per interview | 5-12 Interviews |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Problem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer Segments |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | DiscoveryInterviewsValidation |