View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Systems Thinking Iceberg Model |  Systems Thinking Systems Mapping |  Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring. | Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-2 h | 30-60 min | 1-3 h | 2-6 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 2-10 | 3-12 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas | System Map, Dependencies, Leverage Points | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas |
Tagsno overlap | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns | Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality |