methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Red Teaming method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Red Teaming
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Purposedifferent
Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.For strategic decisions with high reach, agreement and gut feeling are often not enough. Red teaming brings deliberate opposition into the situation and tests where a plan breaks under real counterarguments.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
2-4 h1-4 h1-3 h60-180 min
Participantsdifferent
2-83-82-84-20
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixChallenge Findings, Risk Register, Mitigation PlanIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking Notes
Tagsno overlap
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
RiskDecisionSensemaking
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
Add more methods