methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration for Standard Work Analysis.
Operations
Standard Work Analysis
Paper illustration for Kaizen Event.
Operations
Kaizen Event
Purposedifferent
Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When the same task is done differently depending on the person, the method exposes the reliable core. It creates comparability without unnecessarily choking off needed latitude.For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
2-4 h30-120 min1-3 h0.5-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-82-62-64-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasStandard Work Sheet, Deviation List, Improved Standard, Training NeedsKaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update
Tagsno overlap
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
LeanObservationProcessOperations
LeanProcessQuality
LeanContinuous improvementOperations
Add more methods