methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
2-4 h60-120 min2-6 h2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
2-82-83-83-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections
Tagsno overlap
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
Add more methods