methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Paper illustration for Intervention Mapping.
Systems Thinking
Intervention Mapping
Iceberg Model method illustration showing its working structure
Systems Thinking
Iceberg Model
Purposedifferent
Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain.The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h45-120 min1-5 Tage30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-82-64-122-10
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixChange Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action ListLogic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation PlanIceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
ChangeSystems thinkingCapability
Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns
Add more methods