methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Kaizen Event.
Operations
Kaizen Event
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Purposedifferent
Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h15-45 min0.5-5 Tage30-120 min
Participantsdifferent
2-81-34-102-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixADR File, Decision Log, RationaleKaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work UpdateObservation Notes, Improvement Ideas
Tagsno overlap
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
LeanContinuous improvementOperations
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Add more methods