methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Competency Questions with its method-specific working model.
Knowledge Modeling
Competency Questions
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Architecture Inception Canvas method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Architecture Inception Canvas
A paper-based illustration representing Context Canvas with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Context Canvas
Purposedifferent
Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails.When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h15-45 min1-2 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-81-33-83-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage MatrixADR File, Decision Log, RationaleInception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open QuestionsContext canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes
Tagsno overlap
OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
AlignmentArchitectureCanvas
ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas
Add more methods