View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Delivery Communication Plan | ![]() Product Discovery Riskiest Assumption Test | ![]() Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix | ![]() Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost. | When an idea hinges on one critical unknown, it prioritizes testing that exact piece of uncertainty first. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a prioritized list of assumptions, a test plan, and a result report. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 1-2 Wochen pro Iteration | 45-75 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 2-6 | 2-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Communication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message Cadence | Prioritized Assumption List, Test Plan, Results Report | Test Matrix, Test Plan | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryAssumptions | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |



