methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
45-120 min2-4 h2-6 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
2-63-123-84-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Change Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action List7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods