methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Paper illustration for Option Framing.
Decision Making
Option Framing
Purposedifferent
For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
45-120 min45-90 min30-90 min45-120 min
Participantsdifferent
2-63-121-63-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Change Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action ListForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk NotesDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListOption Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs
Tagsno overlap
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
ChangeDecisionStrategy
DecisionTreeOptions
OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison
Add more methods