View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Operations Change Analysis | ![]() Operations Fault Tree Analysis | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Operations MORT Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise. | For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | For a safety-relevant event or a system with high protection requirements, the method examines where controls failed. It exposes both technical and organizational gaps. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 45-120 min | 2-6 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | Mehrere Tage bis Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Change Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action List | Fault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control Actions | RAID Log, Status Report Source | MORT Worksheets, Findings per Branch, Corrective Actions, Systemic Recommendations |
Tagsno overlap | ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison | RiskRoot causeSafety | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | Root causeSafetySystemicIncident |



