methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Change Analysis.
Operations
Change Analysis
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Purposedifferent
For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighLow
Timedifferent
45-120 min1-2 h2-6 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
2-62-83-83-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Change Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action ListDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
ChangeDecisionStrategy
Add more methods