methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
The Scrum Team inspects people, interactions, processes, tools, and the Definition of Done, then agrees on a few testable improvements.
Agile
Sprint Retrospective
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Paper illustration for Learning Review.
Operations
Learning Review
Purposedifferent
CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.When a sprint is over and friction shouldn't simply be carried forward, it opens the view onto collaboration and patterns. It creates space to see causes and changes together.A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.After a project phase with mixed results, the method makes learning from the individual case reusable. It connects events, decisions, and systemic conditions into robust insights.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
45-90 minUp to 3 hours for a one-month Sprint; shorter Sprints are usually shorter30-90 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-8Scrum Team2-103-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsImprovement actions, Team agreementsRich Picture, Problem Framing NotesLearning Review Notes, System Factors, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
RetrospectiveImprovementLearning
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
LearningRetrospectiveIncidentOperations
Add more methods