methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Paper illustration for Kepner-Tregoe
Operations
Kepner-Tregoe
Purposedifferent
CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.For a disturbance that's hard to pin down, the method cleanly separates problem, cause, and decision. It reduces mixing when symptoms allow several interpretations.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min1-3 hHalber Tag2-8 h
Participantsdifferent
3-82-85-202-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesSimulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksProblem Analysis, Decision Analysis, Risk Plan
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
ResilienceOperationsIncident
Problem solvingRoot causeDecisionOperations
Add more methods