methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 minHalber Tag30-90 min15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
3-85-202-102-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsSimulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksRich Picture, Problem Framing NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
ResilienceOperationsIncident
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods