methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Rich Picture workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Systems Thinking
Rich Picture
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Purposedifferent
CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.A Rich Picture brings an unclear situation onto a shared drawing. It captures actors, tensions, information flows, and blind spots before the team jumps to solutions too early.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 min30-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-83-102-103-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsRich Picture, Problem Framing NotesResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open Questions
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
AutonomyRolesTeam
Systems thinkingSoft systemsFramingVisualization
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
Add more methods