methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Paper illustration for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Operations
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.For a process, product, or service with noticeable failure risks, the method assesses possible failure modes in advance. It directs attention to combinations of occurrence, effect, and detectability.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighHigh
Timedifferent
45-90 min45-90 min2-6 h2-6 h
Participantsdifferent
3-83-103-103-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, ConstraintsDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsFMEA Table, Risk Priority, Mitigation ActionsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
AutonomyRolesTeam
RiskQualityOperationsRoot cause
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
Add more methods