View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:CATWOE AnalysisArchitecture Decision RecordArchitecture Inception CanvasStakeholder Salience Model
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking CATWOE Analysis | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record | ![]() Architecture Architecture Inception Canvas | ![]() Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | The Architecture Inception Canvas bundles the first architecture questions into a compact decision picture. It fits when an initiative is still in motion but still needs clear guardrails. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 45-90 min | 15-45 min | 1-2 h | 60-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-3 | 3-8 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, Constraints | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Inception Canvas, Risks, Goal List, Open Questions | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class |
Tagsno overlap | Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | AlignmentArchitectureCanvas | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance |



