methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for CATWOE Analysis.
Systems Thinking
CATWOE Analysis
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighLow
Timedifferent
45-90 min45–75 min2-6 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-8Team members involved3-83-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, Constraints4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods