View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture C4 Model |  Decision Making Three-Point Estimation |  Architecture arc42 |  Decision Making PERT Estimation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 h | 10-30 min je Item | 1-2 Tage | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 1-8 | 1-4 | 1-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption Notes | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | PERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | EstimationUncertaintyForecasting | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | EstimationUncertaintyRisk |