methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-4 h5-15 min15-45 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
1-53-201-35-30
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistADR File, Decision Log, RationaleConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods