methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
A paper-based illustration representing C4 Model with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
C4 Model
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Purposedifferent
The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
1-4 h45-90 min1-2 TageHalf day initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
1-53-101-4Ein Team plus Stakeholder
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component DiagramDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role AgreementsArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewTeam API Document
Tagsno overlap
ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization
AutonomyRolesTeam
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
Add more methods