View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Architecture C4 Model | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Team Design Team API | ![]() Operations Accountability Ladder |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document. | With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-4 h | 90-180 min | Half day initial, dann laufend | 20-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 4-12 | Ein Team plus Stakeholder | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Team API Document | Ownership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | TeamAlignmentCommunicationService | ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam |



