View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Architecture C4 Model |  Facilitation Barcamp |  Knowledge Modeling Teach-back |  Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | Teach-back checks whether an explanation actually got through to the other person. The method makes misunderstandings visible early and strengthens shared understanding in advisory and learning situations. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-4 h | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 5-20 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 15-200 | 2-8 | 8-80 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Understanding Check, Clarification Notes, Learning Gaps | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions |
Tagsno overlap | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | LearningUnderstandingCommunication | FacilitationDialogueLarge group |