View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Business Model Stress Test | ![]() Product Strategy DIBB | ![]() Knowledge Modeling NeOn Methodology | ![]() Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Business Model Stress Test checks how well a business model holds up under pressure and headwinds. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a stress-test report and action plan per scenario. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | The NeOn Methodology structures ontology work as a controlled process with reuse, scenarios, and reviews. It is useful when ontologies should not emerge ad hoc but modularly and reusably. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day | 1-2 h | Mehrere Wochen bis Monate | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-8 | 2-10 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Stress Test Report, Action Plan per Scenario | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | Ontology Requirements Specification, Reuse Plan, Ontology Modules, Evaluation Report | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyBusiness modelRiskDiagnosis | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | OntologyMethodologyReuseSemanticEngineering | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery |



