View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Blameless PostmortemARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)Start Stop ContinueMad Sad Glad
| Criterion |  DevOps Blameless Postmortem |  Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs) |  Agile Start Stop Continue |  Agile Mad Sad Glad |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | After an incident with damage or a near miss, the method creates a sober field for learning without assigning blame. It directs attention to the course of events, conditions, and effective countermeasures. | ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification. | When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood. | When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional | 30-60 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | Designers, developers as users, and facilitation | 3-12 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Postmortem Doc, Action Items, Timeline | Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions | Start Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions | Emotion Board, Themes, Action Items |
Tagsno overlap | Site Reliability EngineeringIncidentLearningReliability | ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks | RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection | RetrospectiveTeamReflection |