methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Barrier Analysis with its method-specific working model.
Operations
Barrier Analysis
A hypothetical failure makes concrete risks, signals, and fitting mitigations visible.
Decision Making
Pre-Mortem
Paper illustration for Fault Tree Analysis.
Operations
Fault Tree Analysis
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
For a risk that can only be managed through multiple layers of protection, the method examines the effectiveness of each barrier. It shows where safeguards are missing, too weak, or fail under real conditions.In early initiatives with many uncertainties, planning quickly turns too optimistic. A pre-mortem makes the expected failure visible in advance and sharpens the view of causes, gaps, and countermeasures.For a critical top event with several possible triggers, the method logically models failure paths. It makes visible which combinations of conditions can lead to damage.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h20–45 min2-6 h15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
2-6Small cross-functional group3-82-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Barrier Inventory, Failure Analysis per Barrier, Action BacklogRisk list, Mitigation plan, Assumption logFault Tree, Critical Paths, Cause Hypotheses, Control ActionsRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
Root causeSafetyIncident
RiskDecisionFailurePlanning
RiskRoot causeSafety
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods